Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary
[Table of Contents]
[Previous]
[Next]
|
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
|
INTRODUCTION
TO THE POETICAL BOOKS
by A. R. FAUSSETT
Hebrew poetry is unique in its kind; in essence, the most sublime; in
form, marked by a simplicity and ease which flow from its sublimity.
"The Spirit of the LORD spake by me
[the Hebrew poet], and his word was in my tongue"
(2Sa 23:2).
Even the music was put under the charge of spiritually gifted men; and
one of the chief musicians, Heman, is called "the king's seer in the
words of God"
(1Ch 25:1, 5).
King David is stated to have invented instruments of music
(Am 6:5).
There is not in Hebrew poetry the artistic rhythm of form which appears
in the classical poetry of Greece and Rome, but it amply makes up for
this by its fresh and graceful naturalness.
Early specimens of Hebrew poetry occur; for example, Lamech's skeptical
parody of Enoch's prophecy, or, as others think, lamentation for a
homicide committed in those lawless times in self-defense
(Ge 4:23;
compare
Jude 14;
Ex 32:18;
Nu 21:14, 15, 17, 18, 27
Nu 23:7, 8, 18; 24:3, 15).
The poetical element appears much more in the Old than in the New
Testament. The poetical books are exclusively those of the Old
Testament; and in the Old Testament itself, the portions that are the
most fundamental (for example, the Pentateuch of Moses, the lawgiver,
in its main body), are those which have in them least of the poetical
element in form. Elijah, the father of the prophets, is quite free of
poetical art. The succeeding prophets were not strictly poets, except
in so far as the ecstatic state in inspiration lifted them to poetic
modes of thought and expression. The prophet was more of an inspired
teacher than a poet. It is when the sacred writer acts as the
representative of the personal experiences of the children of
God and of the Church, that poetry finds its proper sphere.
The use of poetry in Scripture was particularly to supply the want not
provided for by the law, namely, of devotional forms to express
in private, and in public joint worship, the feelings of pious
Israelites. The schools of the prophets fostered and diffused a
religious spirit among the people; and we find them using lyric
instruments to accompany their prophesyings
(1Sa 10:5).
However, it was David, who specially matured the lyric effusions of
devotion into a perfection which they had not before attained.
Another purpose which Psalmody, through David's inspired productions,
served, was to draw forth from under the typical forms of legal
services their hidden essence and spirit, adapting them to the various
spiritual exigencies of individual and congregational life. Nature,
too, is in them shown to speak the glory and goodness of the invisible,
yet ever present God. A handbook of devotion was furnished to the
Israelite whereby he could enter into the true spirit of the services
of the sanctuary, and so feel the need of that coming Messiah, of whom
especially the Book of Psalms testifies throughout. We also, in our
Christian dispensation, need its help in our devotions. Obliged as we
are, notwithstanding our higher privileges in most respects, to walk by
faith rather than by sight in a greater degree than they, we find the
Psalms, with their realizing expression of the felt nearness of God,
the best repertory whence to draw divinely sanctioned language,
wherewith to express our prayers and thanksgivings to God, and our
breathings after holy communion with our fellow saints.
As to the objection raised against the spirit of revenge which breathes
in some psalms, the answer is: a wide distinction is to be drawn
between personal vindictiveness and the desire for God's honor being
vindicated. Personal revenge, not only in the other parts of Scripture,
but also in the Psalms, in theory and in practice, is alike reprobated
(Ex 23:4, 5;
Le 19:18;
Job 31:29, 30;
Ps 7:4, 5, 8, 11, 12;
Pr 25:21, 22),
which corresponds to David's practice in the case of his unrelenting
enemy
(1Sa 24:5-6; 26:8-10).
On the other hand, the people of God have always desired that whatever
mars the cause of God, as for instance the prosperity of the enemies of
God and His Church, should be brought to an end
(Ps 10:12; 35:27; 40:16; 79:6, 10).
It is well for us, too, in our dispensation of love, to be reminded by
these psalms of the danger of lax views as to God's hatred of sin; and
of the need there is that we should altogether enter into the mind of
God on such points at the same time that we seek to convert all men to
God (compare
1Sa 16:1;
Ps 139:21;
Isa 66:24;
Re 14:10).
Some psalms are composed of twenty-two parallel sentences or strophes
of verses, beginning with words of which the initial letters correspond
with the Hebrew letters (twenty-two) in their order (compare
Ps 37:1-40
and Ps 119:1-176).
So also Lamentations. This arrangement was designed as a help to the
memory and is found only in such compositions as do not handle a
distinct and progressive subject, but a series of pious reflections, in
the case of which the precise order was of less moment. The Psalmist in
adopting it does not slavishly follow it; but, as in
Psalm 25,
he deviates from it, so as to make the form, when needful, bend to the
sense. Of these poems there are twelve in all in the Hebrew Bible
(Ps 25:1-22;
34:1-22; 37:1-40; 111:1-10; 112:1-10; 119:1-176; 145:1-21
Pr 31:10-31;
La 1:1-4:22).
The great excellence of the Hebrew principle of versification, namely,
parallelism, or "thought rhythm" [EWALD], is that,
while the poetry of every other language, whose versification depends
on the regular recurrences of certain sounds, suffers considerably by
translation, Hebrew poetry, whose rhythm depends on the parallel
correspondence of similar thoughts, loses almost nothing in
being translated--the Holy Spirit having thus presciently provided for
its ultimate translation into every language, without loss to the
sense. Thus in our English Version, Job and Psalms, though but
translations, are eminently poetical. On parallelism, see my
Introduction to Job.
Thus also a clue is given to the meaning in many passages, the
sense of the word in one clause being more fully set forth by the
corresponding word in the succeeding parallel clause. In the Masoretic
punctuation of the Hebrew, the metrical arrangement is marked by the
distinctive accents. It accords with the divine inspiration of
Scripture poetry, that the thought is more prominent than the
form, the kernel than the shell. The Hebrew poetic rhythm resembled
our blank verse, without, however, metrical feet. There is a
verbal rhythm above that of prose; but as the true Hebrew
pronunciation is lost, the rhythm is but imperfectly recognized.
The peculiarity of the Hebrew poetical age is that it was always
historic and true, not mythical, as the early poetical ages
of all other nations. Again, its poetry is distinguished from prose by
the use of terms decidedly poetic. David's lament over Jonathan
furnishes a beautiful specimen of another feature found in Hebrew
poetry, the strophe: three strophes being marked by the
recurrence three times of the dirge sung by the chorus; the first dirge
sung by the whole body of singers, representing Israel; the second, by
a chorus of damsels; the third, by a chorus of youths
(2Sa 1:17-27).
The lyrical poetry, which is the predominant style in the Bible and is
especially terse and sententious, seems to have come from an earlier
kind resembling the more modern Book of Proverbs (compare
Ge 4:23, 24).
The Oriental mind tends to embody thought in pithy gnomes, maxims, and
proverbs. "The poetry of the Easterns is a string of pearls. Every word
has life. Every proposition is condensed wisdom. Every thought is
striking and epigrammatical" (KITTO, Biblical
Cyclopædia). We are led to the same inference from the term
Maschal, a "proverb" or "similitude," being used to designate
poetry in general. "Hebrew poetry, in its origin, was a painting
to the eye, a parable or teaching by likenesses discovered by the
popular mind, expressed by the popular tongue, and adopted and polished
by the national poet." Solomon, under inspiration, may have embodied in
his Proverbs such of the pre-existing popular wise sayings as were
sanctioned by the Spirit of God.
The Hebrew title for the Psalms, Tehilim, means "hymns," that
is, joyous praises (sometimes accompanied with dancing,
Ex 15:1-20;
Jud 5:1-31),
not exactly answering to the Septuagint title, Psalms,
that is, "lyrical odes," or songs accompanied by an instrument. The
title, Tehilim, "hymns," was probably adopted on account of
the use made of the Psalms in divine service, though only a part
can be strictly called songs of praise, others being dirges, and
very many prayers (whence in
Ps 72:20,
David styles all his previous compositions, the prayers of
David). Sixty-five bear the title, "lyrical odes"
(Mizmorim), while only one is styled Tehilah or "Hymn."
From the title being Psalms in the Septuagint and New Testament,
and also in the Peshito, it is probable that Psalms
(Mizmorim) or "lyrical odes," was the old title before
Tehilim.
Epic poetry, as having its proper sphere in a mythical heroic
age, has no place among the Hebrews of the Old Testament Scripture
age. For in their earliest ages, namely, the patriarchal, not
fable as in Greece, Rome, Egypt, and all heathen nations, but
truth and historic reality reigned; so much so, that the
poetic element, which is the offspring of the imagination, is found
less in those earlier, than in the later, ages. The Pentateuch is
almost throughout historic prose. In the subsequent uninspired age, in
Tobit we have some approach to the Epos.
Drama, also, in the full modern sense, is not found in Hebrew
literature. This was due, not to any want of intellectual culture, as
is fully shown by the high excellence of their lyric and didactic
poetry, but to their earnest character, and to the solemnity of the
subjects of their literature. The dramatic element appears in Job, more
than in any other book in the Bible; there are the dramatis
personæ, a plot, and the "denouement" prepared for by Elihu,
the fourth friend's speech, and brought about by the interposition of
Jehovah Himself. Still it is not a strict drama, but rather an
inspired debate on a difficult problem of the divine government
exemplified in Job's case, with historic narrative, prologue, and
epilogue. The Song of Solomon, too, has much of the dramatic cast. See
my
Introductions to Job
and
Song of Solomon.
The style of many psalms is very dramatic, transitions often
occurring from one to another person, without introduction, and
especially from speaking indirectly of God to addresses
to God; thus in
Ps 32:1, 2,
David makes a general introduction, "Blessed is the man whose iniquity
is forgiven," &c.; then in
Ps 32:3-7,
he passes to addressing God directly;
then in
Ps 32:8,
without preface God is introduced, directly speaking, in answer to the
previous prayer; then in
Ps 32:10, 11,
again he resumes indirect speaking of God, and addresses himself
in conclusion to the righteous. These quick changes of person do not
startle us, but give us a stronger sense of his habitual converse with
God than any assertions could do. Compare also in
Ps 132:8-10,
the prayer, "Arise, O Lord, into thy rest; thou, and the ark of
thy strength. Let thy priests be clothed with righteousness; and
let thy saints shout for joy. For thy servant David's sake turn
not away the face of thine anointed," with God's direct answer, which
follows in almost the words of the prayer, "The Lord hath sworn unto
David," &c.
[Ps 132:11-18].
"This is my rest for ever
[Ps 132:14].
I will clothe her priests with salvation: and her saints
shall shout aloud for joy." Thus also in the
second Psalm,
various personages are introduced, dramatically acting and
speaking--the confederate nations
[Ps 2:1-3],
Jehovah
[Ps 2:4-6],
the Messiah
[Ps 2:7-9],
and the Psalmist
[Ps 2:10-12].
A frequent feature is the alternate succession of parts,
adapting the several psalms to alternate recitation by two
semi-choruses in the temple-worship, followed by a full
chorus between the parts or at the end. (So
Ps 107:15, 21, 31).
DE BURGH, in his valuable
commentary on the Psalms, remarks, "Our cathedral service exemplifies
the form of chanting the Psalms, except that the semi-chorus is
alternately a whole verse, instead of alternating, as of old,
the half verse; while the full chorus is the 'gloria' at
the end of each Psalm."
In conclusion, besides its unique point of excellence, its divine
inspiration, Hebrew poetry is characterized as being essentially
national, yet eminently catholic, speaking to the heart and spiritual
sensibilities of universal humanity. Simple and unconstrained, it is
distinguished by a natural freshness which is the result of its genuine
truthfulness. The Hebrew poet sought not self or his own fame, as did
heathen poets, but he was inspired by the Spirit of God to meet a
pressing want which his own and his nation's spiritual aspirations
after God made to be at once a necessity and a delight. Compare
2Sa 23:1, 2,
"The sweet Psalmist of Israel said, The Spirit of the LORD spake by me," &c.
EWALD rightly remarks that several odes of the
highest poetic excellence are not included (for example, the songs of
Moses,
Ex 15:1-19
and De 32:1-43;
of Deborah,
Jud 5:1-31;
of Hannah,
1Sa 2:1-10;
of Hezekiah,
Isa 38:9-20;
of Habakkuk,
Hab 3:1-19;
and even David's dirge over Saul and Jonathan,
2Sa 1:17-18).
The selection of the Psalms collected in one book was made not so much
with reference to the beauty of the pieces, as to their adaptation for
public worship. Still one overruling Spirit ordered the selection and
arrangement of the contents of the book, as one pervading tone and
subject appear throughout, Christ in His own inner life as the God-man,
and in His past, present, and future relations to the Church and the
world. ISAAC TAYLOR well
calls the Psalms, "The Liturgy of the spiritual life"; and
LUTHER, "A Bible in miniature."
The principle of the order in which the Psalms are given to us,
though not always discoverable, is in some cases clear, and shows the
arrangement to be unmistakably the work of the Spirit, not merely that
of the collector. Thus
Psalm 22
plainly portrays the dying agonies of Messiah;
Psalm 23,
His peaceful rest in Paradise after His death on the cross; and
Psalm 24,
His glorious ascension into heaven.
[Table of Contents]
[Previous]
[Next]
|
Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
|
|