Teens Reading

Jesus Every Day

The goal of this website is to provide you with daily resources that will help you grow in your faith and walk closer to Jesus every day.
Family reading Bible
Menu
  • Home Page
  • Bible Study Tools
  • Devotionals
  • Audio Bible
  • Bible Quiz
  • Tracts
  • Evangelism
  • Bible Answers
  • Bible Answers for Kids
  • Search the Bible
  • Christian Quotes
  • Christian Free Stuff
  • Free Christian Books
  • John MacArthur Books
  • Christian News


  • Christian Entertainment
  • Christian Music
  • Online Movies
  • Movie Reviews
  • Video Game Reviews
  • Cartoons
  • Jokes
  • Crosswords
  • Christian Podcasting
  • Online Radio Stations
  • Christian Singles


  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy
  • Links

  • International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

    ISBE Index:
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

    The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia Online

    Previous: HEWER Next: HEZEKI

    HEXATEUCH

    hek'-sa-tuk:

    1. Evidence for:

    This word, formed on the analogy of Pentateuch, Heptateuch, etc., is used by modern writers to denote the first six books of the Bible (i.e. the Law and Joshua) collectively. Many critics hold that these six books were composed out of the sources JEP, etc. (on which see PENTATEUCH, 1 ), and only separated very much later into different works. The main grounds for this belief are: (1) the obvious fact that Josh provides the sequel to the Pentateuch, narrating the conquest and settlement in Canaan to which the latter work looks forward, and (2) certain material and stylistic resemblances. The composition of the respective works is considered in the articles PENTATEUCH and JOSHUA.

    2. Evidence against:

    Here we must glance at the evidence against theory of a Hexateuch. It is admitted that there is no trace of any such work as the Hexateuch anywhere in tradition. The Jewish Canon places the Pentateuch in a separate category from Joshua. The Samaritans went farther and adopted the Pentateuch alone. The orthography of the two works differs in certain important particulars (see E. Konig, Einleitung, 151 f, 250). Hence, a different literary history has to be postulated for the two works, even by those who adopt theory of a Hexateuch. But that theory is open to objection on other grounds. There are grave differences of opinion among its supporters as to whether all the supposed Pentateuchal documents are present in Joshua, and in any case it is held that they are quite differently worked up, the redactors having proceeded on one system in the Pentateuch and on quite another in Joshua. Arguments are given in the article PENTATEUCH to show the presence of Mosaic and pre-Mosaic elements in the Pentateuch and the unsoundness of the documentary theory in that work, and if these be correct theory of a Hexateuch necessarily falls to the ground.

    For Bibliography see PENTATEUCH, 1 ; JOSHUA, BOOK OF .

    Harold M. Wiener

     



    From the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
    Edited by James Orr, published in 1939 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.




    Are you a good person? Try the good person test.

    Are you a good person?

    Gospel for Asia

    Download e-Sword



    © 2010 JesusEveryDay.com